引用 作者: parodielin 查看文章
The answer is a big fat No.

For speaker design, having an anechoic room is the least important factor. You can achieve high precision without an anechoic room.

http://parodielin.blogspot.com/2011/09/6.html

Some people would say one has to know the limit of non-anechoic room. In reality and practice, one has to know the limitation of using an anechoic room.
為什麼要經過-無響室來評定喇叭的性能.?
簡單講還不是要補償耳朵的不足.
您說了~無響室的好處了..那也是絕對優勢呀.
也才足以做為判/定規範的一個步驟不是嗎.?
原廠喇叭測試其實一向是只報喜..不會報憂的.否則別賣了..:P
它們的測試標準就是定在這種規則下..
哪裡會去管你要怎麼使用.受你家空間效應的影響有多大.?

在下認得某些燒友.一心要自組喇叭系統(不是自製歐.).
儘管都用了當代最頂尖的單體與分頻用零件來組合..
也自信滿滿調整2年到認為最恰當最中性..
結果..別人一聽就明指..哪兒怪怪的.?
不信..下去實測.
連最基本頻響這關都過不去了..哪還能奢望其他.?