
-
2011-02-14, 08:56 AM
#621
現場常常是不存在的
-
The Following User Says Thank You to hojuiyang111 For This Useful Post:
-
2011-03-01, 12:09 PM
#622
Diffusion
1.it tampers with the arrival schedule of normal room reflections in ways that make it hard for your brain to get a clear fix on the listening-room layer.
2. the diffusor breaks up irritating slap and flutter echoes that often plague playback in domestic listening environments. These echoes---artifacts of reflective, parallel room surfaces---overlay the music that follows and obscure its inner details.
3.the diffusor tames comb-filter-type frequency colorations, previously addressed only by laboriously tweaking the physical position of the speakers relative to room boundaries. By decreasing the depth and increasing the density and irregularity of comb-filter notches, the diffusor makes optimum speaker placement decidedly less critical.
4. and potentially most remarkable benefit of diffusion is that the flooding of the listening room with diffuse sound fosters a sensation of complete envelopment or immersion in a musical event, as opposed to the disengaged puzzling over sonic minutiae that too often passes for the audiophile listening experience.
In sum, with adequate diffusion, you can theoretically get a small listening room to sound rather like a very good concert hall because, psychoacoustically, all the same basic ingredients are there: a large enough time gap between direct sound and first reflected spike; lack of slap and flutter echoes and comb-filter colorations characteristic of small rooms; and the envelopment that comes from a dense, smoothly decaying reverberation that permeates the whole room.
-
-
2011-03-01, 01:25 PM
#623
 作者: hojuiyang111
In sum, with adequate diffusion, you can theoretically get a small listening room to sound rather like a very good concert hall.
這就是為什麼我能擴散的地方就擴散, 理論上我的空間小, 常識會告訴我應該要多吸, 但是比較過吸與擴的效果, 我喜歡擴散多過很多......
我的經驗是,
低頻吸音 (300HZ以下), 小房間低頻越吸越猛
中高頻(700, 800HZ以上)擴散, 越擴越有現場的感覺
經驗與個人喜好不一定正確或合大家口味, 請參考參考就好!:)
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to chsiang For This Useful Post:
-
2011-03-01, 03:38 PM
#624
 作者: chsiang
這就是為什麼我能擴散的地方就擴散, 理論上我的空間小, 常識會告訴我應該要多吸, 但是比較過吸與擴的效果, 我喜歡擴散多過很多......
我的經驗是,
低頻吸音 (300HZ以下), 小房間低頻越吸越猛
中高頻(700, 800HZ以上)擴散, 越擴越有現場的感覺
經驗與個人喜好不一定正確或合大家口味, 請參考參考就好!:)
記得chsiang兄是開放空間,
應該不用吸太多,
如您所言,擴散或許是好方向,
不過擴散器多半也有較小的吸音率.
-
-
2011-04-05, 10:40 AM
#625
不同時期
不同時期,系統會有不同的聲音.
意味著系統是會變化的,
口味是也會變化的,
所以可能沒有什麼是一定對的.
不必堅持什麼,
虛心聆聽別人的意見及聲音,
才有助自我的提昇.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to hojuiyang111 For This Useful Post:
-
2011-04-24, 09:54 AM
#626
常見震動處理的手法有那些呢?
1.隔離
2.傳導
3.吸收
4.阻尼
5.綜合
6.直接避免或降低震動
-
-
2011-04-24, 10:01 AM
#627
 作者: hojuiyang111
為何說現場常常是不存在的,
因為錄音現場的處理,
有了這些處理,加上錄音後制,
往往聲音和原有 現場未有處理時很大差別.
所以音響系統中的聲音,
是錄音團隊要表達的聲音,
可能和現場一點關係都沒有.
-
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to hojuiyang111 For This Useful Post:
-
2011-05-11, 11:05 AM
#628
賺錢 v.s 玩音響(興趣)
努力賺錢比玩音響(興趣)重要?
兩者都很重要呀..
除了自我實踐,
人生存重要追求之一,
就是在心中填滿美好的記憶.
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to hojuiyang111 For This Useful Post:
-
2011-05-26, 03:24 PM
#629
什麼是好的器材
器材容易使用的意涵可能有幾種:
1.沒有什麼好調整的.所以很容易使用.
2.有很多環節可調整 .所以很容易使用.
3.有些是可調整,有些是不可調整的,所以很容易使用.
-
-
2011-05-29, 11:21 AM
#630
 作者: hojuiyang111
器材容易使用的意涵可能有幾種:
1.沒有什麼好調整的.所以很容易使用.
2.有很多環節可調整 .所以很容易使用.
3.有些是可調整,有些是不可調整的,所以很容易使用.
有趣的是每個用家或設計者對上面的選項,
可能會有不同的喜好.
買家了解產品的設計,
依自己的習慣或調音方式作選擇.
不過,太困難設定的器材,
入門者宜三思.
-
發文規則
- 您不可以發表新主題
- 您不可以發表回覆
- 您不可以上傳附件
- 您不可以編輯自己的文章
-
討論區規則
|