你連打字都會結巴哦,po兩次
可列印查看
你連打字都會結巴哦,po兩次
用馬克那隻麥克風調完應該有85分了,如果換Mcintosh那台,基本上聽說是換個殼而已,不過................樣子比較好看,視覺應該可以幫助加個幾分。
昨天又回來了幾個秘密武器,也買了一個秘密武器,再加個幾分應該不成問題,要破90就要換沙發了。
OK, Lyndorf處理完的效果真的很不錯, 但隱惡揚善也不是我的作風~~~
聲音有遺憾嗎? 真的要雞蛋裡挑骨頭, 昨天在場的人都認為, 人聲在形體以及密度的地方還有進步的空間,
怎麼說呢? 看圖也是可以說故事的!
我們來看1/12 octave平均過 (方便解讀, 但又不過度粉飾太平) 的頻率響應,
http://my-hiend.com/markho/2013-5-1/fr_difference.jpg
注意400~700Hz這一段, 處理完後 (紅色的線)反而更低了 (遠離基準),
平均差異在5dB左右!
或許是低頻的校正量稍大, 或者壓低拉高一起做也連帶影響中頻了吧?
不過我認為這個問題透過喇叭擺位應可以有效地解決, 將兩聲道的距離適度縮小一些應可適度補一下這個頻段!
沙發靠頭的地方!lyngdorf唯一無法校正的地方就是皇帝位耳朵的後方!
要不要試試原廠建議的貼墻放啊!
原廠說明:
Due to the fact that a traditional box loudspeakerhas omnipolar dispersion in the bass region, this ‘free space’ placement has a big disadvantagenamely that you actually risk ‘destroying the impulse response. If you place the loudspeaker close to the back wall the bass reflections from the wall and thedirect sound will arrive simultaneously at the listening position – i.e. the impulse response inthe bass region can be improved considerably and RoomPerfect can easily compensate forthe uneven frequency response as a consequence of the placement. So, with RoomPerfect, itcan actually be an advantage to choose what’s normally regarded as a less ideal ‘close wall‘loudspeaker placement as this will not only improve the impulse response. Also, whencompensating for the increased efficiency, the load on both amplifier and loudspeaker isdecreased whereby less distortion and better headroom is achieved. And taking energy out ofthe system also has another advantage since pumping less energy into the room means thatroom modes are less excited. Thus you achieve a much more even power response across theroom – i.e. the differences between peaks and dips in the response are reduced dramatically.
DQEX 那台要付錢跟他們連線做測試及校正。那台校正 speaker frequency-response and timing errors.而且每個單元都校正。這樣喇叭的個性會不會也被喬掉?而且它會bypass喇叭的被動分音器。